<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News Flash!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/announcement/news-flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/announcement/news-flash/</link>
	<description>insights into psychological type models</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:06:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous INTJ</title>
		<link>http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/announcement/news-flash/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous INTJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-198</guid>
		<description>&quot;At least I think it’s INTJ! I forgot to ask for clarity around Thinking versus Feeling.

…Is there really any doubt about that?&quot;

Would it be possible for you to contact this person again in order to verify the INTJ/INFJ question by 100%?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;At least I think it’s INTJ! I forgot to ask for clarity around Thinking versus Feeling.</p>
<p>…Is there really any doubt about that?&#8221;</p>
<p>Would it be possible for you to contact this person again in order to verify the INTJ/INFJ question by 100%?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/announcement/news-flash/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-196</guid>
		<description>As an INTP, I was always a bit tepid on the idea that Jung was my type.  He was so much broader in his imagining and mysticism (dare I say this). An INFJ or INTJ seemed more likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an INTP, I was always a bit tepid on the idea that Jung was my type.  He was so much broader in his imagining and mysticism (dare I say this). An INFJ or INTJ seemed more likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/announcement/news-flash/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Oops, I meant to say Ti tertiary.  I actually dreamt about the mistake.  Talk about a WWJD (What would Jung do) moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, I meant to say Ti tertiary.  I actually dreamt about the mistake.  Talk about a WWJD (What would Jung do) moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marilyn Mitton</title>
		<link>http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/announcement/news-flash/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Marilyn Mitton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-193</guid>
		<description>My experience with Type is certainly limited compared to the other writers.....but my impression in reading Jung was that he&#039;s either INTP or writing in a style more often used by INTP&#039;s.  I&#039;m INTJ and have wondered if he purposefully wrote using the style of his auxiliary or tertiary.....weird theory, but it keeps popping up as a possibility in my mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience with Type is certainly limited compared to the other writers&#8230;..but my impression in reading Jung was that he&#8217;s either INTP or writing in a style more often used by INTP&#8217;s.  I&#8217;m INTJ and have wondered if he purposefully wrote using the style of his auxiliary or tertiary&#8230;..weird theory, but it keeps popping up as a possibility in my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/announcement/news-flash/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-191</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always thought he was an INFJ with a very developed Te tertiary.  Most INFJs I know in modern society *must* develop the tertiary more than normal because the INFJ preferences are ill-suited for our modern world devoid of mysticism and poetry (to summarize a very complicated reasoning).  The INFJs I know who don&#039;t develop Te &quot;out of order?&quot; - they&#039;re poets and mystics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always thought he was an INFJ with a very developed Te tertiary.  Most INFJs I know in modern society *must* develop the tertiary more than normal because the INFJ preferences are ill-suited for our modern world devoid of mysticism and poetry (to summarize a very complicated reasoning).  The INFJs I know who don&#8217;t develop Te &#8220;out of order?&#8221; &#8211; they&#8217;re poets and mystics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash</title>
		<link>http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/announcement/news-flash/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-190</guid>
		<description>Hello, Vicky. 
Well, today I was discussing with someone precisely Jung&#039;s type (would you call that synchronicity?). My impression was introverted intuition all the way. But, seemingly unlike you, I tend to think he uses introverted thinking intensely (more than a NiTe should). What if he was an infj who (willingly) developed his tertiary to a great extent, maybe to counterballance his secondary? 
To you he seems so similar to intjs? My husbad is also intj (I&#039;ll just ignore the coincidence) and he&#039;s much less interested in &#039;human systems&#039; than Jung was. He does have that mystical/empiricist combo, though. But maybe it also depends on each person&#039;s evolution and calling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Vicky.<br />
Well, today I was discussing with someone precisely Jung&#8217;s type (would you call that synchronicity?). My impression was introverted intuition all the way. But, seemingly unlike you, I tend to think he uses introverted thinking intensely (more than a NiTe should). What if he was an infj who (willingly) developed his tertiary to a great extent, maybe to counterballance his secondary?<br />
To you he seems so similar to intjs? My husbad is also intj (I&#8217;ll just ignore the coincidence) and he&#8217;s much less interested in &#8216;human systems&#8217; than Jung was. He does have that mystical/empiricist combo, though. But maybe it also depends on each person&#8217;s evolution and calling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dian Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/announcement/news-flash/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Dian Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Pretty interesting...thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty interesting&#8230;thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

