<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News Flash!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/announcement/news-flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/announcement/news-flash/</link>
	<description>insights into psychological type models</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous INTJ</title>
		<link>http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/announcement/news-flash/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous INTJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-198</guid>
		<description>"At least I think it’s INTJ! I forgot to ask for clarity around Thinking versus Feeling.

…Is there really any doubt about that?"

Would it be possible for you to contact this person again in order to verify the INTJ/INFJ question by 100%?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;At least I think it’s INTJ! I forgot to ask for clarity around Thinking versus Feeling.</p>
<p>…Is there really any doubt about that?&#8221;</p>
<p>Would it be possible for you to contact this person again in order to verify the INTJ/INFJ question by 100%?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/announcement/news-flash/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-196</guid>
		<description>As an INTP, I was always a bit tepid on the idea that Jung was my type.  He was so much broader in his imagining and mysticism (dare I say this). An INFJ or INTJ seemed more likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an INTP, I was always a bit tepid on the idea that Jung was my type.  He was so much broader in his imagining and mysticism (dare I say this). An INFJ or INTJ seemed more likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/announcement/news-flash/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Oops, I meant to say Ti tertiary.  I actually dreamt about the mistake.  Talk about a WWJD (What would Jung do) moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, I meant to say Ti tertiary.  I actually dreamt about the mistake.  Talk about a WWJD (What would Jung do) moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marilyn Mitton</title>
		<link>http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/announcement/news-flash/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Marilyn Mitton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-193</guid>
		<description>My experience with Type is certainly limited compared to the other writers.....but my impression in reading Jung was that he's either INTP or writing in a style more often used by INTP's.  I'm INTJ and have wondered if he purposefully wrote using the style of his auxiliary or tertiary.....weird theory, but it keeps popping up as a possibility in my mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience with Type is certainly limited compared to the other writers&#8230;..but my impression in reading Jung was that he&#8217;s either INTP or writing in a style more often used by INTP&#8217;s.  I&#8217;m INTJ and have wondered if he purposefully wrote using the style of his auxiliary or tertiary&#8230;..weird theory, but it keeps popping up as a possibility in my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/announcement/news-flash/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-191</guid>
		<description>I've always thought he was an INFJ with a very developed Te tertiary.  Most INFJs I know in modern society *must* develop the tertiary more than normal because the INFJ preferences are ill-suited for our modern world devoid of mysticism and poetry (to summarize a very complicated reasoning).  The INFJs I know who don't develop Te "out of order?" - they're poets and mystics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always thought he was an INFJ with a very developed Te tertiary.  Most INFJs I know in modern society *must* develop the tertiary more than normal because the INFJ preferences are ill-suited for our modern world devoid of mysticism and poetry (to summarize a very complicated reasoning).  The INFJs I know who don&#8217;t develop Te &#8220;out of order?&#8221; - they&#8217;re poets and mystics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash</title>
		<link>http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/announcement/news-flash/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-190</guid>
		<description>Hello, Vicky. 
Well, today I was discussing with someone precisely Jung's type (would you call that synchronicity?). My impression was introverted intuition all the way. But, seemingly unlike you, I tend to think he uses introverted thinking intensely (more than a NiTe should). What if he was an infj who (willingly) developed his tertiary to a great extent, maybe to counterballance his secondary? 
To you he seems so similar to intjs? My husbad is also intj (I'll just ignore the coincidence) and he's much less interested in 'human systems' than Jung was. He does have that mystical/empiricist combo, though. But maybe it also depends on each person's evolution and calling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Vicky.<br />
Well, today I was discussing with someone precisely Jung&#8217;s type (would you call that synchronicity?). My impression was introverted intuition all the way. But, seemingly unlike you, I tend to think he uses introverted thinking intensely (more than a NiTe should). What if he was an infj who (willingly) developed his tertiary to a great extent, maybe to counterballance his secondary?<br />
To you he seems so similar to intjs? My husbad is also intj (I&#8217;ll just ignore the coincidence) and he&#8217;s much less interested in &#8216;human systems&#8217; than Jung was. He does have that mystical/empiricist combo, though. But maybe it also depends on each person&#8217;s evolution and calling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dian Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/announcement/news-flash/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Dian Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Pretty interesting...thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty interesting&#8230;thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
