<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sensors and Intuitors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/appropriate-use-of-type/sensors-and-intuitors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/appropriate-use-of-type/sensors-and-intuitors/</link>
	<description>insights into psychological type models</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:06:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/appropriate-use-of-type/sensors-and-intuitors/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/?p=1062#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Thank you!  Thank you!!! 

I totally agree that type preferences are much more &quot;elastic&quot; than many people give them credit for.  I actually can&#039;t think of anyone I know reasonably well who fits neatly into one of those rigid &quot;Sensor&quot; or &quot;Intuitor&quot; boxes that so many people talk about.

You would think even the die-hard labelers would get bored with those rigid categories after a while and want it to become something more, but I guess at that point they just drop the whole subject and move on. Kind of a pity.  Along with the whole &quot;owning your own shadow&quot; stuff, it&#039;s one of the best tools I&#039;ve seen for helping me understand where I can trust my instincts and where I need to grow, and also how I can demonstrate love to others in a way that honors them instead of forces them to temporarily have to think like me in order to appreciate what I&#039;m doing.

:)

Sarah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!  Thank you!!! </p>
<p>I totally agree that type preferences are much more &#8220;elastic&#8221; than many people give them credit for.  I actually can&#8217;t think of anyone I know reasonably well who fits neatly into one of those rigid &#8220;Sensor&#8221; or &#8220;Intuitor&#8221; boxes that so many people talk about.</p>
<p>You would think even the die-hard labelers would get bored with those rigid categories after a while and want it to become something more, but I guess at that point they just drop the whole subject and move on. Kind of a pity.  Along with the whole &#8220;owning your own shadow&#8221; stuff, it&#8217;s one of the best tools I&#8217;ve seen for helping me understand where I can trust my instincts and where I need to grow, and also how I can demonstrate love to others in a way that honors them instead of forces them to temporarily have to think like me in order to appreciate what I&#8217;m doing.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.typeinsights.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Sarah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

